A | B | C
| D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K
| L | M | N | O |P
| Q | R | S | T | U | V | W
| X | Y | Z
Archer DF et al.: Endometrial morphology
in asymptomatic postmenopausal women, Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:317-322,
1991.
Aznar R et al: Electrocardiographic changes induced
by insertion of an intrauterine device and other uterine manipulations,
Fertility and Sterility 27:92-6, 1976.
Baitlon D, Hadley JO: Endometrial
biopsy–pathologic findings in 3,600 biopsies from selected patients,
Am J Clin Pathol 63:9-15 1975.
Barakat RR: Tamoxifen and endometrial neoplasia,
Clin Obstet Gynecol 39:629-640, 1996.
Breckenridge JW et al: Postmenopausal uterine
fluid collection: indicator of carcinoma, AJR 139:529-534, 1982.
Bornstein J et al: Diagnostic pitfalls of ultrasonographic
uterine screening in women treated with tamoxifen, J Reprod Med
39:674-678, 1994.
Burk JR, Lehman HF, Wolf FS: Inadequacy of Papanicolaou
smears in the detection of endometrial cancer, N Engl J Med 291:191-192,
1974.
Carlson JA et al: Clinical and
pathologic correlation of endometrial cavith fluid detected by ultrasound
in the postmenopausal patient, Obstet Gynecol 77:119-123, 1991.
Cherkis RC et al: Significance of atypical endometrial
cells detected by cervical cytology, Obstet Gynecol 69:786-789,
1987.
Cicinelli E et al: Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic
hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomized
placebo-controlled double-blind study, Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 104:316-319,
1977.
Cornier E: The Pipelle: a disposable device for
endometrial biopsy, Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:109-110, 1984.
Dajani AS et al: Prevention of bacterial
endocarditis–recommendations by the American Heart Association,
JAMA 277:1794-1801, 1997.
Eddowes HA: Pipelle: a more acceptable
technique for outpatient endometrial biopsy, Br J Obstet Gynaecol
97:961-962, 1990.
Eddy GL et al: Papanicolaou smears by the Bethesda
system in endometrial malignancy: utility and prognostic importance, Obstet
Gynecol 90:999-1003, 1997.
Ferry J et al: The efficacy of the
Pipelle endometrial biopsy in detecting endometrial carcinoma, Aust
NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 33:76-78, 1993.
Fornander T et al: Adjuvant tamoxifen in early
breast cancer: occurence of new primary cancers, Lancet 21:117-120,
1989.
Forrester J: Instrumental dilation of the uterine
cervix in antiquity–a myth or not?, J Roy Soc Med 84:67,
1991.
Fothergill DJ, Brown VA, Hill AS: Histological
sampling of the endometrium–a comparison between formal curettage
and the Pipelle sampler, Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:779-780, 1992.
Goldchmit R et al: The accuracy
of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement
of endometrial thickness, Obstet Gynecol 82:727-30, 1993..
Goldstein SR: Postmenopausal endometrial fluid
collections revisited: look at the doughnut rather than the hole, Obstet
Gynecol 83:738-740, 1994.
Gondos B, King E: Significance of endometrial cells
in cervicovaginal smears, Ann Clin Lab Sci 7:486-490, 1977.
Gorbach SL et al: Anaerobic microflora of the cervix
in healthy women, Am J Obstet Gynecol 117:1053-1055, 1973.
Greenwood SM, Wright DJ: Evaluation of the office
endometrial biopsy in the detection of endometrial carcinoma and atypical
hyperplasia, Cancer 43:1474-1478, 1979.
Grimes DA: Diagnostic dilation and curettage: a
reappraisal, Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:1-6, 1982.
Guido RS et al: Pipelle endometrial sampling–sensitivity
in detection of endometrial cancer, J Reprod Med 40:553-555, 1995.
Hale RW et al: Histopathologic evaluation
of uteri curetted by flexible suction cannula, Am J Obstet Gynecol
125:805-808, 1976.
Harris RE, Marraro RV, Ugenas AJ: Bacteremia or
pelvic infection—A consequence of gynecologic biopsies?, Am J
Obstet Gynecol 136:408-409, 1980.
Heller DS, Drosinos S, Westhoff C: Does endometrial
biopsy miss endometrial carcinoma?, Int J Gynecol Obstet 48:107-108,
1995.
Henig I et al: Evaluation of the Pipelle curette
for endometrial biopsy, J Reprod Med 34:786-789, 1989.
Hofmeister FJ, Vondrak B, Barbo DM: The value
of the endometrial biopsy–a study of 14,655 office endometrial biopsies,
Am J Obstet Gynecol 95:91-98, 1966.
Jensen JG: Vaccum curettage: out-patient
curettage without anaesthesia; a report of 350 cases, Dan Med Bull
17:199-202, 1970.
Kaunitz AM et al: Comparison of
endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator, J
Reprod Med 33:427-431, 1988.
Kelly HA: Curettage without anesthesia on the office
table, Am J Obstet Gynecol 9:78-80, 1925..
Kelly HA: Gynecology, New York, 1928, D.
Appleton and Company.
Koonings PP, Moyer DL, Grimes D: A randomized
clinical trial comparing Pipelle and Tis-u-trap for endometrial biopsy,
Obstet Gynecol 75:293-295, 1990.
Koss LG et al: Detection of endometrial carcinoma
and hyperplasia in asymptomatic women, Obstet Gynecol 64:1-11,
1984.
Kurman RJ, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ: The behavior
of endometrial hyperplasia—a long-term study of "untreated" hyperplasia
in 170 patients, Cancer 56:403-412, 1985.
Langer RD et al, Transvaginal ultrasonography
compared with endometrial biopsy for the detection of endometrial disease,
N Engl J Med 337:1792-1798, 1997.
Li TC, Cooke ID: Delayed abdominal pain after outpatient
endometrial biopsy in the luteal phase, Int J Gynecol Obstet 32:267-268,
1990.
Lipscomb GH et al: A randomized comparison of
the Pipelle, Acurette, and Explora endometrial sampling devices, Am
J Obstet Gynecol 170:591-594, 1994.
Livengood CH, Land MR, Addison WA: Endometrial
biopsy, bacteremia, and endocarditis risk, Obstet Gynecol 65:678-681,
1985.
Lutz MH et al: Vacuum aspiration: an efficient outpatient
screening technic for endometrial disease, Southern Med J 70:393-395,
1977.
Mishell DR et al: Comprehensive
gynecology, St Louis, 1997, Mosby.
Ng ABP et al: Significance of endometrial
cells in the detection of endometrial carcinoma and its precursors, Acta
Cytol 18:356-361, 1974.
Novak E: A suction-curet apparatus for endometrial
biopsy, JAMA 104:1497-1498, 1935.
Padwick ML, Pryse-Davies J, Whitehead
MI: A simple method for determing the optimal dosage of progestin in postmenopausal
women receiving estrogens, N Engl J Med 315:930-934, 1986.
Perkins RL, Hernandez E, Berenberg JL: Septicemia
in a postmenopausal woman after endometrial biopsy, Am J Gynecol Health
4:20-22, 1990.
Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC: Procedures for
primary care physicians, St. Louis, 1994, Mosby.
Rabin JM et al: Topical anesthesia
for gynecologic procedures, Obstet Gynecol 73:1040-1044, 1989.
Randall LM: Endometrial biopsy, Pro Staff Meet
Mayo Clinic 10:143-144, 1935.
Ricci JV: One hundred years of gynecology,
Philadelphia, 1945, Blakiston.
Rodriguez GC, Yaqub N, King ME: A comparison
of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial
denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the Pipelle device samples significantly
less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator, Am J Obstet
Gynecol 168:55-59, 1993.
Ryan KJ, Berkowitz RS, Barbieri RL: Kistner's gynecology—principles
and practice, St Louis, 1995, Mosby.
Silver MM, Miles P, Rosa C: Comparison
of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments, Obstet Gynecol
78:828-830, 1991.
Sims JM: Clinical notes on uterine surgery,
New York, 1869, William Wood and Co.
Sledmere CM et al: Psychological aspects of Vabra
curettage in menopause clinics, Maturitas 3:205-213, 1981.
Stock RJ, Kanbour A: Prehysterectomy curettage, Obstet
Gynecol 45:537-541, 1975.
Stovall TG, Ling FW, Morgan PL: A prospective,
randomized comparison of the Pipelle endometrial sampling device with
the Novak curette, Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:1287-1289, 1991.
Stovall TG et al: Pipelle endometrial sampling
in patients with known endometrial carcinoma, Obstet Gynecol 77:954-956,
1991.
Symonds EM, Macpherson MBA: Diagnosis in color:
obstetrics and gynecology, ed 2, London, 1997, Mosby-Wolfe.
Yancey M et al: Classification of
endometrial cells on cervical cytology, Obstet Gynecol 76:1000-1005,
1990.
|
Send
to a friend
Printer
friendly page
Get
PDF
