- Sampling problems
- No endocervical component present
The sensitivity and specificity of cervical sampling may be lower in practice than is reported in the literature because of sampling error, poor fixation, or inaccurate interpretation. In fact, the false negative rate ranges
from 1% to 80% (USPSTF).
Sampling problems
Common sampling problems have led pathologists to report on the adequacy of the specimen, in addition to the cytopathology. If the specimen is
reported as unsatisfactory, the examination must be repeated. The specimen
may be reported as unsatisfactory for several reasons:
- Improper labeling of the slide
- Inadequate number of cells collected or transferred onto the slide
- Poor fixation, which distorts cells (air drying artifact, for example)
- Contaminant (such as lubricant jelly)
- Blood obscuring the cells (avoid collecting a Pap smear during menses)
- Inflammation obscuring cells (treat cervical or vaginal infections
with appropriate antibiotics before repeating the Pap smear)
- Cytolysis or autolysis (this is often seen in women who are pregnant or have a low vaginal pH)
(UNMC, Sanfilippo)
No endocervical component present
Interpretation of a Pap smear may also be problematic if the report
states that the specimen is satisfactory for interpretation but lacks
an endocervical component. This designation is used when cells from
the squamocolumnar junction are not present on the sample. The Bethesda
System classifies this as "less than optimal—no endocervical component
present." The endocervical or transformation zone (TZ) component is
defined either by endocervical glands or cells, or by metaplastic squamous
cells. Obtaining cells from the transition zone is important because
this is where most cervical dysplasia is seen. Several factors may affect
the yield of endocervical cells:
- Sampling technique
- Prior cervical procedures
- Surgical absence of the cervix
- Oral contraceptives
- Hormonal status of the patient (The TZ in postmenopausal women may
be high within the endocervical canal.)
- Pregnancy
(DiSaia, Appleby)
Experts disagree on the management of the patient who lacks endocervical
cells on Pap smear, in part because of conflicting evidence regarding
the importance of collecting endocervical cells. The Interim Guidelines
for Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology state that "the absence
of a TZ component (endocervical cells or metaplastic squamous cells)
should not be the only criterion for repeating the test." Cross-sectional
studies report more abnormalities on smears containing endocervical
cells than on smears without such cells. Yet, longitudinal studies do
not report increased numbers of abnormalities on subsequent smears when
endocervical cells were absent from the first smear. The 1992 National
Cancer Institute (NCI) Workshop addressed these inconsistencies. The
NCI Workshop recommends that routine follow-up at prescribed intervals
is satisfactory without an endocervical component if:
- There is no suspicion of a premalignant lesion
- There is nothing of concern in the patient’s clinical history
- There is no abnormality identified on physical examination
- There is no previous abnormal smear
- There are no other clinical risk factors
(O'Leary)
Miller et al state, "If no endocervical cells are present, the Pap
smear may need to be repeated, depending on the patient’s risk factors. We believe that a repeat Pap smear is indicated if the first sample is inadequate in any patient with one or more of the risk factors" (Miller).
Complications of the Papanicolaou Smear
Doing a Pap smear seldom causes significant complications. The most
common complication is minor bleeding from irritation of friable mucosa
by the speculum or cervical sampling instruments. Patients should be
warned that spotting is normal following the pelvic examination. There
may also be mild discomfort, but this is short lived.