A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O |P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Archer DF et al.: Endometrial morphology in asymptomatic postmenopausal women, Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:317-322, 1991.

Aznar R et al: Electrocardiographic changes induced by insertion of an intrauterine device and other uterine manipulations, Fertility and Sterility 27:92-6, 1976.

Baitlon D, Hadley JO: Endometrial biopsy–pathologic findings in 3,600 biopsies from selected patients, Am J Clin Pathol 63:9-15 1975.

Barakat RR: Tamoxifen and endometrial neoplasia, Clin Obstet Gynecol 39:629-640, 1996.

Breckenridge JW et al: Postmenopausal uterine fluid collection: indicator of carcinoma, AJR 139:529-534, 1982.

Bornstein J et al: Diagnostic pitfalls of ultrasonographic uterine screening in women treated with tamoxifen, J Reprod Med 39:674-678, 1994.

Burk JR, Lehman HF, Wolf FS: Inadequacy of Papanicolaou smears in the detection of endometrial cancer, N Engl J Med 291:191-192, 1974.

Carlson JA et al: Clinical and pathologic correlation of endometrial cavith fluid detected by ultrasound in the postmenopausal patient, Obstet Gynecol 77:119-123, 1991.

Cherkis RC et al: Significance of atypical endometrial cells detected by cervical cytology, Obstet Gynecol 69:786-789, 1987.

Cicinelli E et al: Topical anaesthesia for diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal women: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study, Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 104:316-319, 1977.

Cornier E: The Pipelle: a disposable device for endometrial biopsy, Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:109-110, 1984.

Dajani AS et al: Prevention of bacterial endocarditis–recommendations by the American Heart Association, JAMA 277:1794-1801, 1997.

Eddowes HA: Pipelle: a more acceptable technique for outpatient endometrial biopsy, Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:961-962, 1990.

Eddy GL et al: Papanicolaou smears by the Bethesda system in endometrial malignancy: utility and prognostic importance, Obstet Gynecol 90:999-1003, 1997.

Ferry J et al: The efficacy of the Pipelle endometrial biopsy in detecting endometrial carcinoma, Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 33:76-78, 1993.

Fornander T et al: Adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer: occurence of new primary cancers, Lancet 21:117-120, 1989.

Forrester J: Instrumental dilation of the uterine cervix in antiquity–a myth or not?, J Roy Soc Med 84:67, 1991.

Fothergill DJ, Brown VA, Hill AS: Histological sampling of the endometrium–a comparison between formal curettage and the Pipelle sampler, Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:779-780, 1992.

Goldchmit R et al: The accuracy of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness, Obstet Gynecol 82:727-30, 1993..

Goldstein SR: Postmenopausal endometrial fluid collections revisited: look at the doughnut rather than the hole, Obstet Gynecol 83:738-740, 1994.

Gondos B, King E: Significance of endometrial cells in cervicovaginal smears, Ann Clin Lab Sci 7:486-490, 1977.

Gorbach SL et al: Anaerobic microflora of the cervix in healthy women, Am J Obstet Gynecol 117:1053-1055, 1973.

Greenwood SM, Wright DJ: Evaluation of the office endometrial biopsy in the detection of endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia, Cancer 43:1474-1478, 1979.

Grimes DA: Diagnostic dilation and curettage: a reappraisal, Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:1-6, 1982.

Guido RS et al: Pipelle endometrial sampling–sensitivity in detection of endometrial cancer, J Reprod Med 40:553-555, 1995.

Hale RW et al: Histopathologic evaluation of uteri curetted by flexible suction cannula, Am J Obstet Gynecol 125:805-808, 1976.

Harris RE, Marraro RV, Ugenas AJ: Bacteremia or pelvic infection—A consequence of gynecologic biopsies?, Am J Obstet Gynecol 136:408-409, 1980.

Heller DS, Drosinos S, Westhoff C: Does endometrial biopsy miss endometrial carcinoma?, Int J Gynecol Obstet 48:107-108, 1995.

Henig I et al: Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy, J Reprod Med 34:786-789, 1989.

Hofmeister FJ, Vondrak B, Barbo DM: The value of the endometrial biopsy–a study of 14,655 office endometrial biopsies, Am J Obstet Gynecol 95:91-98, 1966.

Jensen JG: Vaccum curettage: out-patient curettage without anaesthesia; a report of 350 cases, Dan Med Bull 17:199-202, 1970.

Kaunitz AM et al: Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator, J Reprod Med 33:427-431, 1988.

Kelly HA: Curettage without anesthesia on the office table, Am J Obstet Gynecol 9:78-80, 1925..

Kelly HA: Gynecology, New York, 1928, D. Appleton and Company.

Koonings PP, Moyer DL, Grimes D: A randomized clinical trial comparing Pipelle and Tis-u-trap for endometrial biopsy, Obstet Gynecol 75:293-295, 1990.

Koss LG et al: Detection of endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia in asymptomatic women, Obstet Gynecol 64:1-11, 1984.

Kurman RJ, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ: The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia—a long-term study of "untreated" hyperplasia in 170 patients, Cancer 56:403-412, 1985.

Langer RD et al, Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with endometrial biopsy for the detection of endometrial disease, N Engl J Med 337:1792-1798, 1997.

Li TC, Cooke ID: Delayed abdominal pain after outpatient endometrial biopsy in the luteal phase, Int J Gynecol Obstet 32:267-268, 1990.

Lipscomb GH et al: A randomized comparison of the Pipelle, Acurette, and Explora endometrial sampling devices, Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:591-594, 1994.

Livengood CH, Land MR, Addison WA: Endometrial biopsy, bacteremia, and endocarditis risk, Obstet Gynecol 65:678-681, 1985.

Lutz MH et al: Vacuum aspiration: an efficient outpatient screening technic for endometrial disease, Southern Med J 70:393-395, 1977.

Mishell DR et al: Comprehensive gynecology, St Louis, 1997, Mosby.

Ng ABP et al: Significance of endometrial cells in the detection of endometrial carcinoma and its precursors, Acta Cytol 18:356-361, 1974.

Novak E: A suction-curet apparatus for endometrial biopsy, JAMA 104:1497-1498, 1935.

Padwick ML, Pryse-Davies J, Whitehead MI: A simple method for determing the optimal dosage of progestin in postmenopausal women receiving estrogens, N Engl J Med 315:930-934, 1986.

Perkins RL, Hernandez E, Berenberg JL: Septicemia in a postmenopausal woman after endometrial biopsy, Am J Gynecol Health 4:20-22, 1990.

Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC: Procedures for primary care physicians, St. Louis, 1994, Mosby.

Rabin JM et al: Topical anesthesia for gynecologic procedures, Obstet Gynecol 73:1040-1044, 1989.

Randall LM: Endometrial biopsy, Pro Staff Meet Mayo Clinic 10:143-144, 1935.

Ricci JV: One hundred years of gynecology, Philadelphia, 1945, Blakiston.

Rodriguez GC, Yaqub N, King ME: A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator, Am J Obstet Gynecol 168:55-59, 1993.

Ryan KJ, Berkowitz RS, Barbieri RL: Kistner's gynecology—principles and practice, St Louis, 1995, Mosby.

Silver MM, Miles P, Rosa C: Comparison of Novak and Pipelle endometrial biopsy instruments, Obstet Gynecol 78:828-830, 1991.

Sims JM: Clinical notes on uterine surgery, New York, 1869, William Wood and Co.

Sledmere CM et al: Psychological aspects of Vabra curettage in menopause clinics, Maturitas 3:205-213, 1981.

Stock RJ, Kanbour A: Prehysterectomy curettage, Obstet Gynecol 45:537-541, 1975.

Stovall TG, Ling FW, Morgan PL: A prospective, randomized comparison of the Pipelle endometrial sampling device with the Novak curette, Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:1287-1289, 1991.

Stovall TG et al: Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma, Obstet Gynecol 77:954-956, 1991.

Symonds EM, Macpherson MBA: Diagnosis in color: obstetrics and gynecology, ed 2, London, 1997, Mosby-Wolfe.

Yancey M et al: Classification of endometrial cells on cervical cytology, Obstet Gynecol 76:1000-1005, 1990.