|
Grading of Colposcopic Lesion
- Introduction to colposcopic grading systems
- Coppelson Grading System
- Reid Colposcopic Index
Introduction to colposcopic grading systems
Several colposcopic grading systems have been developed to quantify the examiner's
impression regarding the severity of a lesion. All are based on the fact that the more
abnormal the colposcopic appearance, the greater the probable histologic
abnormality.
The nature of the abnormal colposcopic lesion depends on the degree of whiteness of the
epithelium, the rapidity with which the whiteness occurs, the nature of the surface contour
(whether flat or irregular), the fineness or coarseness of the caliber of the punctate
vessels and their intercapillary distances, the irregularity and pleomorphism of the mosaic
pattern, and the presence or absence of atypical blood vessels.
Helpful distinguishing features:
- Indicators of minor changes
- Acetowhite epithelium
- Fine mosaicism
- Fine punctation
- Thin leukoplakia
- Indicators of major changes
- Dense acetowhite epithelium
- Coarse mosaicism
- Coarse punctation
- Thick leukoplakia
- Atypical vessels
- Erosions
(Carreiro,
Burghardt )
Coppelson Grading System
Grade I
- Color tone judged normal or slightly whiter than normal
- Smooth surface, flat lesion
- Border of lesion diffuse
- White appearance of lesion takes a moderate time to develop, stays white for a
short time, and disappears rapidly
- If any vascular changes are present, they are typically fine punctation or
mosaicism or both, without increase in intercapillary distances
- Could represent human papilloma virus (HPV) disease, pregnancy, metaplasia,
inflammation, or regeneration and repair
Grade II
- More intense whiteness
- Appears in normal time span, tends to stay white for several minutes,
disappears with average speed
- Sharp border dividing it from surrounding normal epithelium
- Usually some vascular pattern present in form of irregular punctation or
mosaicism, with slight increase in intercapillary distance
- May represent mild to moderate intraepithelial neoplastic changes or HPV
infection
Grade III
- Very coarse white epithelium
- Clear-cut elevation of surface pattern
- Border sharp and distinct
- Irregular surface contour
- Marked rapidity and intensity of epithelial whiteness; lesion stays white
longer and fades more slowly
- Punctation or mosaicism presentintercapillary distances usually
increased
- Application of acetic acid causes epithelium to roll up like wet cigarette
paper, because of loss of intercellular bonds
- Possible loss of surface epithelium and ulceration
- Atypical blood vessels may be bizarre in invasive lesions
- May represent severe intraepithelial neoplastic changes or microinvasive or
invasive cervical disease
Reid Colposcopic Index
An overall improvment in sensitivity (increasing the detection rate) and specificity
(reducing the overestimation rate) can be achieved by applying a weighted scoring system
such as described by Reid and colleagues in 1985.
| Colposcopic signs |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| Margin |
Condylomatous, micropapillary, indistinct acetowhite,
flocculated, feathered, angular, jagged, satellite lesions |
Regular lesions, smooth, straight outlines |
Rolled, peeling edge, internal demarcations between areas |
| Color |
Shiny, snow-white, indistinct acetowhite |
Intermediate (shiny gray) |
Dull, oyster-white |
| Vessels |
Fine-caliber, poorly formed, patterns, condylomatous,
or micropapillary |
Absent |
Definite punctation or mosaicism |
| Iodine |
Positive staining |
Partial uptake |
Significant negativity |
Assign from 0 to 2 points to each colposcopic sign:
-
0-2 : benign HPV infection or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1
-
3-5 : CIN 1 or CIN 2
-
6-8 : CIN 2 or CIN 3
|

Comparing colposcopic and cytologic
findings.
|
Colposcopic grading in general correlates well with the
underlying histology. Again, the more pronounced the colposcopic findings, the greater the
anticipated histologic abnormality. A colposcopic grade I lesion correlates with a
histologic grade I lesion (such as mild dysplasia) (Burke, Wright).
It is possible for an experienced colposcopist to differentiate among the various forms
of intraepithelial neoplasia and early invasive cancer on the basis of the colposcopic
findings. A final diagnosis is reached by using the results of the cytologic examination,
colposcopy, and colposcopic-directed biopsies and the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
|