|
Vaginal Secretions: Technical
Problems
Sampling of vaginal secretions should not lead to any additional risk
or complications beyond that of doing a standard pelvic examination. Certain
technical problems, however, may make the specimen difficult to interpret
or produce artifactual results.
Clinical factors
The quality of the vaginal secretions being sampled and thus the ability
to make an accurate diagnosis can be affected by the following factors:
- Recent menses
- Recent douching
- Recent intravaginal medication
- Recent sexual intercourse–presence of semen
- Recent systemic antibiotics
- Use of lubricants during examination before sampling secretions
All of the above can affect the clinical diagnosis by changing the consistency,
amount, and appearance of the vaginal discharge, by affecting the pH of
the secretions, and by changing the whiff test. Menses, douching, and
semen can increase the pH. Water used to lubricate the speculum can increase
the pH, as can the lubricant used in the bimanual examination. Remember
to use lubricant only after all samples have been taken, including the
Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. In addition, a weakly positive whiff test can
be due to the presence of semen or menstrual blood in the vagina. The
above factors also potentially affect the laboratory yield. For example,
a culture or Gram stain result may be affected by the recent use of systemic
antibiotics or intravaginal medications.
Sampling method
The method of sampling also has a few pitfalls. The vaginal sample must
be taken with care so as not to contaminate the sample with the cervical
secretions. Conversely, when a sample is taken from the cervical os, it
is important to remove the swab carefully, avoiding any contact with the
vaginal mucosa that will potentially affect the results of the laboratory
testing. When samples of cervical secretions are obtained, time should
be taken to twirl the swab carefully for a full 10 to 15 seconds (Sweet).
Sample preparation
Although sample preparation is quite easy to perform, the manner in which
the saline wet mount and KOH are prepared is important to the success
in identifying elements for diagnosis. In general, for saline wet mount
a smaller amount of discharge should be used, with relatively more saline
to help disperse the epithelial cells. If too little discharge is used,
there may not be enough identifying elements to make the diagnosis. If
too much is used relative to saline, there will be excessive clumping,
making the slide difficult if not impossible to read. For KOH prep, some
sources report more success with diagnosis when using relatively more
discharge in proportion to KOH because this may increase the number of
organisms seen (Eschenbach).
In general it is best to read the wet mount and KOH prep as soon as they
are prepared, since excess drying of the slide can cause distortion of
identifying elements. In addition, trichomonads lose mobility with drying
and with variation in temperature beyond 32° to 37° C (Kreiger).
Processing delays
The means by which the sample is stored and handled prior to arrival in
the laboratory is vitally important to achieving an accurate result on
testing. The laboratory test is only as good as the quality of the sample
received by the laboratory. Remember to send the specimen to the laboratory
as soon as possible. Follow directions on testing kits whenever possible.
When culturing specific organisms remember their individual growth requirements.
|